Let's define units of stakes, it could take into account more things but this could be one of the usable definitions:
Dim a stake as 0.00000000001% GDP (including equivalents)
When the stakes are below 10, common popular customs defined by influencers apply
When the stakes are above 10 but lower than 100, the terms and conditions should apply
Now since units of stakes have been defined, people could have multiple versions of Legal Fields applied to their contents.
When the stakes are above 100, below 500, the pro terms and conditions would apply, and so on and so on.
-------------------------
Equivalence definition could be referenced from barter tax laws... (maybe)
-------------------------
Now that we could have multiple terms, I hope at higher stakes there could be a requirement for corporations to sit down and consider counter contracts from their counterparts. Single way contract at high stakes should not be applied unwillfully to another. At least we should be able to express our will in a socially commonly intuitive manner.
-------------------------
The power to refuse from being involved in something, including in higher stake interactions should be a right, and should be protected, for that being a part of Justice
